Also, point 2 is just lmao
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What interesting about C. Thomas is his narrow lane of rightwing kookery is much less popular than his wife's
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
3 turns on a conflict of interest that would exist whether or not 2 were true. 2 isn't true, but that's a matter of some debate. 3 is a pretty simple application of relatively objective, broadly held professional standards. It's the better argument from a lawyer's pov.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
Not that it factors in, but, he just got out of the hospital. Though... good timing? Seriously, he must be aware of what he wife does. Does she seem like someone who would tell everyone else the stuff she believes/ does and not tell him? He knows. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/supreme-court-justice-thomas-released-from-hospital/ar-AAVuDrl …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I mean, match them up with 1, and they are ALL in tension!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2 is bullshit, because he didn’t do 3!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He mispelled rigor mortis.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really. 2 is about whether he is actually biased. 3. is about whether he could reasonably be seen as potentially biased.
-
No because if 2 was accurate 3 wouldn't even come into play because he would recuse himself
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.