Clarence: "What did you do today, honey?" Ginni: "Oh, this and that...shall we talk about something neutral that will not require your recusal, like we always do?"
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No one is more esoteric than Jeff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks Joe Biden for saddling us with this pair.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Gee, if only we had a Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges that *applied to SCOTUS* (instead of making our nation's highest court *the sole exception to our judicial ethics rules*)? Maybe Congress cld take this up sometime? Or is that too rational an idea?

-
Um the SC as currently constituted (or as constituted in any foreseeable future) would strike that down.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I guess “I’ve never seen or even bothered to look for anyone trying to demonstrate Clarence Thomas has an ethical problem requiring action” doesn’t have the same ring.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s called “ethics” - something that’s not taught in universities & law schools anymore
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.