"I'm very worried about Putin's nuclear threats which is why I'm advocating brinksmanship" is, to be honest, not a coherent position.https://twitter.com/McFaul/status/1501785341933592582 …
-
-
just lose you will to live and it'll be fine
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are a lot of steps between 15,000 pound lz clearing bombs and nuclear war. He's already stepped up to thermobaric and cluster. We know he's got a lot of chemical and biological weapons, probably smallpox. Then field nukes.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
He probably would have been part of a Hilary Clinton Administration in National Security so it's probably very personal for him.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's not cavalier. It's pragmatic. Realistic. You think it's not an eventuality regardless? That's quaint.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you imagine this guy was the US Ambassador to Russia and considered a leading Russia scholar? Perfect representative of the US foreign policy establishment.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Come on. He’s not being cavalier. He’s making a risk-benefit assessment based on years of experience. If you take Putin‘s nuclear threats at face value we’d being doing nothing. Which is exactly what he wants.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I mean, we're not, specifically, worried about one Nuke (one Nuke against a military base, or whatever, isn't all that different from a big group of sorties). We're worried that most scenarios involve one from begetting hundreds.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
