I'm a bit shocked at how cavalier people, including people who have held positions of high office, are about nuclear war. It's a bit unsettling.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It is coherent though. He’s willing to trade off what he judges to be an infinitesimal larger chance of triggering a nuclear exchange for the benefits of improving Ukraine’s military position, saving civilians, etc.
-
*infinitesimally
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I can't believe how many people have decided that any action leads to NUCLEAR WAR!!! Get a grip.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
His nuclear threats are designed to paralyze the West. He cannot afford to escalate the war. If he's "crazy", then we'll have to confront him eventually... when he's in a stronger position.
-
if he's really "crazy", what difference would it make, he'd launch the nukes any day.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You might want to check your AP style guide on your use of quotation marks here, Jeet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Turkey is selling those TB2s to Ukraine... I haven't seen Putin escalate with Turkey.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Here is the thing I don’t get: why are Javelins, which murder scores of Russians daily, inside the bounds of acceptable risk, but planes are akin to caressing the Big Red Button? I get the caution, but we’re currently giving Ukraine murder tools. So who are we fooling?
-
Antitank and antiaircraft weapons are considered defensive. Tanks and aircraft are considered offensive. Granted, you can break someone's neck with the edge of a shield, but a sword is designed to do it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.