1. This is a good & balanced report on Chrystia Freeland's twitter account posting a photo of her with a scarf that was an emblem of the UPA, a Ukrainian fascist paramilitary group once aligned with the Nazis.https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/2022/03/02/the-controversy-over-chrystia-freeland-and-the-ukrainian-scarf-explained.html?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=SocialMedia&utm_campaign=Federalpolitics&utm_content=freelandscarf&utm_source=twitter&source=torontostar&utm_medium=SocialMedia&utm_campaign=&utm_campaign_id=&utm_content= …
-
-
As you said, the article was very balanced. So what is prompting your negative take on the matter? Is there another agenda here? Other evidence? I agree that the better move would have been an apology and a new tweet. I don't subscribe to nefarious notions of Nazis with Freeland.
-
Because the article still didnt address the fascism problem in the Canadian Ukranian diaspora. It's a huge omission, imo
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So true
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.