Lee wasn't paid by the word but he needed to write a lot of words to justify his employment. After all, if the artist was providing plot & notes, how does Lee justify getting 100% of the writer's fee?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
How do you know Lee was getting writer's fees in addition to his editorial salary? Companies don't as a rule allow employees to engage in self-dealing. Martin Goodman's accountants all but certainly would have red-flagged it if it was going on. BS comics lore strikes again.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
The first is that you'll follow the example and politely admit error when you've erred, instead of digging in your heels and trying to bully your interlocutor. /2
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RSMwriter
I'm sorry but I have no further interest in engaging with you. Your comments are inevitably dishonest, blustery defenses of corrupt corporate policies. Best wishes, JH
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Interesting, because I wasn't defending a corporate policy here, and I generally don't. At most, I just try to explicate them. Being able to explicate something without polemicizing doesn't mean agreeing with it. But pandering demagogues like yourself do find that inconvenient.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.