This would explain the wild discrepancy between what Ukrainian government (until it was brought in line) was saying and what Washington has been saying. Maybe there's some genius chess playing going on but I don't think "alarmism" is sustainable as a policyhttps://twitter.com/juliaioffe/status/1493947410372079624 …
-
-
I really don’t understand what non-alarmist depiction of the current massive troop buildup and utterly explicit threats you’d prefer.
-
There is troop build-up and explicit threats. This could be a clear signal of a coming invasion or posturing. If the admin is choosing to message that it's the former because it is beneficial, then this opens up people to criticize whether it is, in fact, beneficial
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
describing reality is describing reality
-
Hard to disagree. :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Releasing intel to deter a potential attack isn't exactly alarmism though, is it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.