You'd think it'd be possible to argue -NATO expansion has been disastrous provocation -US must pursue diplomacy, avoid escalation -Russia has legit security concerns re Ukraine without claiming that Ukraine isn't a real country and/or is populated exclusively by Nazis. And yet
-
-
It’s good to see takes like this once in a while just to be reminded that English has great words like codswallop.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My point is that any blame on NATO expansion has to account for the significant delay between that expansion and the current crisis. And that's what doesn't add up to me.
-
Now, if you want to argue that NATO expansion led to Putinism in general, that's one argument, and I kind of understand that. So did our shock doctrine economics. But then, it's all about lost empire, and not about actual security threats.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.