There was a brief moment on Jan. 6 and a few days after when the GOP elite could have rejected Trump. They didn't except in vague tut-tutting, which means party was inevitably going to embrace Jan. 6https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1489670105768370177 …
-
-
There may not be a Civil War but the GOP will be very happy to use the threat of and actual violence to win elections and issues.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Depends. A hot civil war? That's kinda unlikely but can't be ruled out. A cold civil war? I'd argue the US has been at a cold civil war since Reagan. Bush the Younger really accelerated the cold civil war.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
…by the GOP.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Civil War” is the parlance we are familiar with, but what it suggests is that one of two major parties now encourages domestic terrorism as policy. That’s pretty much as scary as “civil war” and not hyperbole.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does this mean leftists now have social permission to occupy legislatures too? If its legitimatized then the next Republican winner can result in riots too
-
Fight fire with fire, I suppose
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The wave of restrictions after the VRA was gutted pointed toward that. Jan 6 points more toward a future of political violence, no?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.