When I do introspection on 2016 I have to conclude my main fault as a writer was I wasn't hard enough on the Clinton campaign and how they bungled things. I really didn't give that the attention it deserved.
-
-
Replying to @HeerJeet @skitter771 and
You have forgotten nothing and learned nothing, then.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @immo_i
As a rational person, I have to conclude that the campaign that lost the election had a bigger role to play in defeat than obvious scapegoats like Sarandon, Brie, etc. The campaign had one job.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
You also had a job. How did you discharge that job? You say: I was right and I should have doubled down. It is a bit astonishing that even in retrospective, you can't admit the slightest error. (Saying I should have been louder is humblebragging, not admitting error).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @immo_i
I did admit a big error: not being critical enough of Clinton campaign. If you go through my articles for 2015/2016, only a small fraction are even mildly critical. https://newrepublic.com/authors/jeet-heer …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So....doubling down on your butthurtness.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @skitter771 @immo_i
I'm not sure what doubling down means (or even buttheart). For most of 2016 I thought Clinton was a strong candidate and expected her to trounce Trump. I overlooked, ignored or was blind to flaws in her campaign. I wish I had done better & listened to her critics. Mea culpa.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
That is, again, a load of horse crap. You promoted the bullshit notion that Trump won't endanger abortion rights in this very thread, undermining her warning at the time. Undermine a strong candidate then do an "oops, she was actually weak" is shameless doubling down.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @skitter771 @immo_i
So your position is my trolling tweets telling right-wingers that Trump will appoint Peter Thiel to legalize harvesting baby parts had a bigger impact on election than decisions made by Robby Mook etc. to not emphasize economic populism. Amazing. Partisanship is a hell of a drug
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This fukhead pretends "it's just trolling", instead of admitting that he explicitly promoted the notion that Trump won't endanger abortion rights, as with other leftist types at the time Pivoting to other causes of your butthurtness re "economic populism" et al isn't clever.pic.twitter.com/AeVd4FklwS
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Again, what part of "Supreme court justice Peter Thiel harvesting baby parts" does not sound like a troll to you?pic.twitter.com/49hihFd5ie
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.