I'm skeptical that naming the Supreme Court building after anyone would restore a supposed "shared sense . . . of what the Supreme Court stands for and what it should represent." (And we might end up with "the Scalia-Ginsburg Supreme Court Building.")https://twitter.com/howappealing/status/1452421257526456325 …
-
-
Of course. I do not disagree. But without Marshall, SCOTUS could not have made any consequential ruling. Taney would be an unknown. That's my point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.