"anonymous sources are cooperating with investigators and have potentially explosive claims" is not *quite* the same thing as evidence of explosive claims
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm a little skeptical of Rolling Stone after their ivermectin-filling-hospitals story turned out to be completely fabricated by a single source and they didn't bother getting any kind of corroboration. Let WaPo or NYT run a story like this and I'll believe it.
-
And it’s reporting on supposed witnesses to the house. So if true, 100% odds we’ll get confirmation. If we don’t, then …
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It is but a.) I feel like we all sort of figured this was the case and b.) it’s not going to change anything.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The whole thing was coordinated with Congress AND the White House
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These are not exactly the most reliable people in the world, so I hope they've got some evidence to back up these claims.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it though?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’m really excited for the Glenn Greenwood mega take. Will definitely display amazing cognitive dissonance
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Congress could and should issue subpoenas and jail anyone who defies them under inherent contempt. Instead they Chuck their oversight duties back to the executive branch that has shown no inclination to do anything. It’s just hot potato.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.