This is correct
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah I… can’t find anything in that list that isn’t a homogenous belief among major American journalists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Correct
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yea the “American Way” is to simply hire editors and managers who have those views and let it trickle down.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Making DC access journalists support a "united Europe" is so funny to me though, you might as well ask them to pledge not to participate as Eurovision contestants. It's not gonna be a problem
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think spelling it out is another level, though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That was my thought, that the requirements are *exactly* the "norms of objectivity". What are the chances of getting hired as a major newspaper columnist or a cable news talking head if you don't meet them? How many communists host Sunday morning shows?
-
What they call "objectivity" is nothing but orthodoxy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
imagine working at the wall street journal and tut-tutting over this when springer does it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Right. How can I be mad that they made their prejudices explicit? It certainly doesn’t make them less trustworthy for it. Not that folks should put much stock in politico to begin with
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.