1. The Federalist Society has a John Eastman problem, which is very similar to Mitch McConnell's Donald Trump problem: what to do with a crucial political ally who has bad optics & damages your attempt to present yourself as a responsible pillar of mainstream.
-
-
4. The ideological laundry operation only works if you are maintain two-faces: a right face of partisan rectitude that attracts the believers and a left face of "we're just a debating society" to get Ivy League big law types (admittedly easy marks) to give you stamp of approval
Show this thread -
5. The Federalist Society is caught in a trap with Eastman: they can neither explicitly disavow him (he represents too big a faction of their membership & donors) nor can they publicly embrace (which would reveal to even lunkhead centrists & MSM the nature of their politics).
Show this thread -
6. So far, Federalist Society has dealt with this through a quiet subrosa distancing from Eastman. But whether that can hold is doubtful. More here:https://jeetheer.substack.com/p/the-federalist-societys-silent-brush?r=bh54&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source= …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Slightly annoying that an organization ideologically closest to John C. Calhoun calls itself Federalist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think after 50 years of this dynamic being successful it’s time to stop pretending there’s any daylight between “right-wing policy preferences”, “respectable legal garb”, and “mainstream buy-in”.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.