which is more popular
-
-
-
Well, wouldn’t 4C physically displace like 400 million Chinese people due to coastal flooding in the next century?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wow. This is insane. Gives me a lot of hope for the future. /s
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only if they both poll well in rural Wisconsin
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
THERE IS NO TENSION BETWEEN DOING BOTH AND HES BEEN OFF THE RAILS IN A WAY I HADNT SEEN UNTILL ALL THE SCREENSHOTS ARE PUT TOGETHER. STOP ISSUE POLLING YOURSELF INTO INSANITY
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the guy we’re being asked to take seriously? Hard pass. Also, he’s innumerate, which is pretty bad for a supposed data scientist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also, equating these two things as similar in magnitude is appalling and ridiculous. A four degree rise would amount to an extinction event.
-
We already are in one to be clear
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The other thing is that climate change is gonna happen while China is not becoming a hegemon (given America still exists)
-
Well except that the US existed when Britain was the world's global hegemon. (But I agree that China won't find hegemony a slum dunk anytime soon)
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.