What?
-
-
-
If you are arguing Democrats should run more moderate candidates and also that they should do popular things, then it becomes a problem when moderates spike popular things.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think the “popularists”, myself included, are vocally and unequivocally against the actions and messaging of the so-called “moderates”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
“We want to trick you into thinking we’re populists”
End of conversation
-
-
-
She’s not a moderate. Putative, or otherwise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only if moderates are popularists. You got some splainin to do Jeet!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can make an argument that the inability of congress to actually _do_ anything to improve the lot of ordinary Americans if a single monied interest might lose out financially as a result, is part of the reason democracy [to the extent it hasn't been bought & sold] is dying...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean, if you read the article, "popularism" is supposed to be focusing on popular policies, as it says, which Manchin and Sinema are not doing since infrastructure spending is popular. That's why it's not called "centrism" or "moderate-ism".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Matt Yglesias and David Shor have been criticising moderates for this for weeks now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.