To be clear, this a Reuters editor responding to a situation in which Andy Ngo, whatever you think of him, undeniably scooped multiple major outlets that treated an alleged sex crime with multiple victims, including a girl, as a hoax. That's the level of professionalism we're athttps://twitter.com/mgerrydoyle/status/1446268467481513985 …
-
-
Well it's him vs. outlets that cape for sex offenders...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly. Ppl think a lot about him and most of its negative. Because the conclusion he jumped to happened to be right in this one instance does not absolve him of the 99%* of things he gets wrong. *based on my rigorous review of his work
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you think Andy Ngo did a worse job on the Wi Spa story than the Guardian and Slate?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I mean, I think it's saying the point about being scooped w/r/t to the Spa case while other outlets just ran with very dubious stories is accurate separate from any other considerations about Ngo, which is accurate
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Whatever you think of him, he made the trains run on time.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does truth matter or does it not? That is the only question.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
that's kinda the point, isn't it? why do otherwise intelligent people insist on playing dumb when trying to score off JS?
-
Jeet isn’t playing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.