2. Hearst has had the odd fate of being a towering historical figure who is largely remembered for a fictionalized account of his life (Citizen Kane). Orson Welles' movie capture much of Hearst, of course, but its elegiac retrospective mood isn't only approach.
-
-
Show this thread
-
3. Citizen Kane, coming out in 1941, was made at a time when Hearsts' reputation was at a near low -- he was Hearst the isolationist, Hearst the anti-New Dealer, Hearst the inflamer of Yellow Peril racism, Hearst the Red-baiter, Hearst the reactionary.
Show this thread -
4. The point of view that Mankiewicz and Welles brought to Hearst was that of disappointed lovers, so they see the earlier crusading and radical Hearst as merely a guise, a rich boy playacting as a revolutionary. But what if that earlier Hearst was sincere?
Show this thread -
5. I talked to
@KenWhyte3, author of a fine Hearst biography, about he press baron's radical days. We cover a lot of ground, including disagreeing about the Spanish American war:https://jeetheer.substack.com/p/podcast-william-randolph-hearst-radical?r=bh54&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&utm_source= …Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He looks like a properly groomed Boris Johnson here.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The parallels with Murdoch and FNN are astounding. TAE and Frontline are the best shows on TV, by far...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Neither Hearst or Pulitzer covered themselves in glory during that period. And, yes, this is delved into.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.