His argument was that a parent limiting the "bodily autonomy" of a child is inherently oppressive. Surely you can see how people might construe that wrt sex. You might argue that's an unfair leap, but it's not like this came out of left field during a disagreement about taxes
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @Trillburne @gabrielwinant and
i mean its also just absurd statement on its face, but thats berlatsky for you
2 replies 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @lionel_trolling @Trillburne and
That's been my whole issue all along. Noah often writes absurd things. If you take what he says to its logical conclusion, you'll end up with some monstrous conclusions. But I'm not sure that's out of malice or foolishness.
7 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet @lionel_trolling and
He is comms director at a place dedicated to advocating that "absurd" position. Do you think he did that just to spite the Bruenigs, or should be maybe entertain the possibility that he actually believes the stuff he says he believes?
2 replies 0 retweets 111 likes -
Replying to @Trillburne @lionel_trolling and
I don't see Berlatsky as someone with genuine beliefs. Working as a comm director for this place is compatible with that.
23 replies 1 retweet 8 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Yeah, I let myself get sidetracked into a non-issue. The question is whether working for Prostasia is itself proof of pedophilia or just a bad thing to do.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.