As far as I know, the "political position" in question here was "children can consent to sex." Maybe I'm just overly suspicious, but my first thought after seeing someone argue that is "maybe that person is a pedophile"
Okay, let's stipulate he believes in organizations agenda (although I remain skeptical he believes anything). His beliefs are still distinct from being pedophile (which is a matter not of ideas by of psychology & action). That's our disagreement here.
-
-
If you slice this distinction any thinner you're gonna split the atom man
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
as an active member of the organization he's already committed himself to action
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
this is going great, man
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only goal of your distinction is so that you can back away from the keyboard, confident you didnt 'lose'. It's meaningless from any greater distance than exists between your screen and the back of your chair.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you've spent all day getting on your high horse and arguing with people over the distinction between "pedophilia advocate" and "pedophile?" Remember, at any point, you are free to just say: "maybe I misjudged this debate and shouldn't have weighed in the way I did"
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
dude what
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
keep going, i think this debate is still viable for you to win
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is generally not a distinction we draw for members of any other criminal organization
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.