Given that the names of police officers who kill unarmed people are always disclosed, what is the argument for why we don't know the killer of Ashli Babbitt and that we should not know? As usual, it's bizarre when journalists are anti-transparency in pursuit of ideology.
-
-
Get him Jeet
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Fucken owned!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks for proving Glenn's point.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
>is making you an apologist for the norm of systematic police misconduct While the link makes an important point, your conclusion is the exact opposite of the truth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm sorry nobody is reading your Substack but you should have concluded by now that the desperate strategy of picking fights with me won't work because it's too transparent and I won't bite. I already resolved this with Wesley and others I respect. Keep chugging along!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Glenn was wrong. You have still mistaken his point.
-
Glenn's point was that people who tried to stop the violent insurrectionists from lynching our representatives should be personally identified so that the same violent mob can destroy them as pushishment.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.