:: cracks knuckles :: okay, Michael's son, let's talk about Nazism's embrace of autarky and Friedrich Ratzelhttps://twitter.com/michaelpreis/status/1412797035951099904 …
-
-
He made it incredibly clear in Mein Kampf. Like, incredibly, incredibly clear.
-
The word “Slav” appears repeatedly, if I recall.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Incredibly high on his own supply
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is the correct answer. For whatever reason people don't believe that man's own statements - he was very clear from the beginning of his political career what he wanted to do, even if it was horrible and insane.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Stalin: The material conditions at the base will shape the superstructure of ideology, and there's no material reason for Hitler to invade . . . Hitler: lol wrong here's some tanks
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, yes. But to a Leninist like Stalin, Hitler was just a mask for the bourgeoisie, which just wanted lots of cheap raw materials, which he was giving. All þe "we need to replace slavs wiþ Aryans just as þe US 'replaced' Amerindians with white Americans was beyond his imagining
-
& where did the T34-C come from, anyway? Clearly I need to procrastinate by spending today reading Glantz's _Barbarossa_...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.