It's not a joke. It's a proof. (That it's a proof by reduction to absurdity makes it also a joke, OK. But the fact that it's a sound proof is important and should not be overlooked on the grounds that it's a joke.)
-
-
Exactly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And to be clear. You know that civil rights disparate impact analysis is normally considered NOT to be common ground with CRT?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Another way to put it would be: the 1982 amendment to the Voting Rights Act is CRT-ish. The goal of anti-CRT is to make it thoughtcrime to consider the logic of that amendment even. Just in school, but that's a way of socially signaling these thoughts are doubleplusungood.
-
You (and everyone else) should really stop using the acronym CRT to refer both to the GOP-catch-all and the body of legal thought. It's confusing, and it makes it too easy for you to make slippery assertions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
As long as we all agree that critical race theory - the school of legal thought - is not, in fact, "mainstream liberal civil rights legal thinking," then I'm fine.
-
As far as I can tell we haven’t gotten that yet.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.