Which curricula?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
That’s just it, the anti-CRT stuff isn’t aimed at the “esoteric scholarly body of thought”, it’s aimed at a wide variety of things (both real and imaginary), and it’s ok to admit that some of those things are both real and (at least arguably) bad.
-
Deliberately taking a term for something controversial that is real & extend it to cover a wide variety of things is demagoguery (see past right-wing uses of anarchism & communism). I understand why right wants to engage in demagoguery. Why do centrists join in?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm disagreeing with your decision to treat debate where CRT is clearly used as bogeyman as if it were really a debate about the merits of CRT. That seems, at best, unwise.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Maybe if CRT activists didn't motte-and-bailey their definition vs implementation this wouldn't be an issue. Don't put crazy and unpopular statements in easily distributable powerpoints on CRT?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're not aimed at stopping the mention, description, or analysis of philisophical theory. They're resisting the practition and application of its ideation onto education outside of and without contextualizing CRT as a topic. CRT isn't fact, it's ideation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.