If you're worried about the North Carolina bill chilling speech that ought to have a place in k through 12 classrooms, what's your best hypothetical about a specific thing that could be problematically targeted, given this text https://www.ncleg.gov/Sessions/2021/Bills/House/PDF/H324v4.pdf …
-
-
Um. 7 is historically correct in that it was created to maintain white male supremacy.
-
2 is revealing. They think that if someone says Black Lives Matter, they are saying white, asian, etc. lives don't matter. That is an absurd interpretation. If I said Orange cats matter, would anyone think I was saying that grey cats do not matter.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Well American history as taught violates this bill!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Number 5 is pretty interesting, too. One can benefit from the egregious actions of one's ancestors without bearing responsibility for them. But if they have benefited from their actions and continue to do so, are the victims in the equation supposed to go away and try harder? hmm
-
That is exactly what they want.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How do u get that from the phrasing of 7?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The English department is going to be doing some heavy lifting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I follow this example less well
-
I'm not allowed to say "meritocracy doesn't actually exist" with examples pulled from American history without violating this law. For example, my students wouldn't be allowed to read W E B du Bois or Angela Davis, both of whom I often teach.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.