No more so than any commercial maritime corridor in the world.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes; global reliance on oil/gas and American domestic politics' approach to Israel is far more salient. It ain't '56 anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can’t give up the Eisenhower Doctrine
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We have one pipeline carrying fuel to the east coast. How’d *that* work out when we had to find other ways to deliver it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The overlap of the the worst regimes/countries with critical trade routes or resources guarantees perpetual conflict.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe looking at it in terms of the goods themselves passing through the canal, instead of as capital flows.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course it's a serious question, one that China has understood for decades, hence why the value the BRI so much. And of course, once climate change opens up the Northeast passage, China will have very little usage for the Suez...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Why is this framed as a US problem? Don't Europe and China have a greater interest in Suez for the flow of goods? "capital". Europe especially. We have the Pacific route to trade with Asia. I suppose you mean the US as enforcers, the muscle. Maybe we should re-consider that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
They can pivot and maintain a foothold.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.