This is much more honest than the usual rigmarole people come up with. It ignores the possible shifts in Jewish-American opinion (towards disengagement with Israel and post-Zionism) as well the electoral costs of a putatively anti-racist party abandoning principles. https://twitter.com/davidshor/status/1394290240450449413 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HeerJeet
Matt Retweeted
I agree with you overall but I don't think David ignores shifts in Jewish public opinion. He acknowledges here the group for whom this is an extremely important issue hold a disproportionate amount of wealth and influence compared to others .https://twitter.com/davidshor/status/1394289739407183878?s=19 …
Matt added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Emptyset09 @HeerJeet
Eric Levitz Retweeted
Yeah, Shor's argument is "about the Benjamins" https://twitter.com/davidshor/status/1394314458084880396 …
Eric Levitz added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
-
Replying to @HeerJeet @Emptyset09
I agree. Just clarifying what the argument is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
it seems to be … about both? because later in the thread he attempts to draw conclusions about shifts toward Trump from 2016-20 in Teaneck as if that is indicative
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Right, there's some slippage in argument from jumping from "a bunch of single-issue pro-Israel voters who have wildly disproportionate economic and political power" to American Jews in general.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.