but how else are over-the-hill pundits supposed to signal how serious and smart they are??
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You know you can just withdraw your name from the Harper's letter like Jennifer Boylan did.
-
Nothing in the letter I disagree with -- it's a statement of general principles you can easily believe as a leftist, as, say, Chomsky does.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
presumably you signed the harper's letter by accident; you didn't have your glasses on, or you'd recently been kicked in the head by a mountain goat and were badly concussed.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Remember when you signed the Harper letter?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Listening to the revolutions podcast and every story in the 1840s is "the left demonstrates and organized to provide the power for the liberals to get what they want. Then liberals team up with cons to destroy the left. Now cons outmuscled the liberals in reaction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(They also gain traction when liberals move left, turning radicalism into something bigger and more threatening to more people.)
-
I'd argue the evidence is against that: liberals turned left from circa 1900-1916 and 1930-1945. It was only after when, for national security reasons, liberals embraced anti-radicalism that reactionary forces were able to come to the fore.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.