The pdfs are wideky available, much like Song of the South DVDs on Amazon.
-
-
Replying to @MaisonDeSnark
I think archival editions that contextual the racism would be better than bootleg pdfs or dvds.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeerJeet
I think the public domain option complicates the copyright laws a bit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MaisonDeSnark @HeerJeet
Voluntarily putting a work in the public domain (prior to the automatic 1000 or whatever year period Disney lobbied for) doesn't really cause copyright issues, does it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrankyPelvis @HeerJeet
Which The Seuss Foundation has decided not to do, and they own the copyright. Basically, it comes down to whether a copyright holder can choose not to publish something they own the right to.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MaisonDeSnark @HeerJeet
Oh yeah, then I agree. I think there's no real legal mechanism for forcing a publisher to reprint something just because it has historical academic merit, I can't think of any fair test that could be applied to determine that merit. It would have to be voluntary
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @FrankyPelvis @MaisonDeSnark
The legal mechanism would be reform to shorten copyright-- which is what I'm arguing for.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The Seuss story is newsworthy and it's a good example of how long-lasting corporate copyrights work against the public interest.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I've long wanted copyright reform and have in the past criticized the extension of copyright for longer and longer periods.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.