I don't understand this thread. The "history of capitalism" stuff is hotly disputed inside academia. People didn't want to join in public shovel fight because Wilentz & co. had framed debate in gate-keeping polarizing way that could be easily be exploited by right (as it was). https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1377649894803054597 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The critiques of the history of capitalism (HIC) are old and preceded anything related to 1619. Important to distinguish the scholarly debate as opposed to the weaponization of 1619 project by conservatives. And some critics of HOC (like me) are very supportive of 1619 project
2 replies 4 retweets 39 likes
Replying to @TrevonDLogan @delong
That's a useful distinction.
10:40 AM - 1 Apr 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.