But very on-brand for the New York Times. This might be a good use case for the @FTC to take a look at with its Endorsement Guidelines.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish you were right but the Newspaper of Impunity doesn’t correct such mistakes much less properly acknowledge them
-
His problem is that this problem can go away for them easily, with one simple step. That is really bad for him.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And especially when you style yourself as a kind of gentleman moralist
-
Thank you!! It’s almost entertaining to see him try to tackle serious social issues. He can’t shake off his composure-class POV for more than about ten seconds. I love this, from a 2011 New Yorker chat —pic.twitter.com/pxI9P4LYf5
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
He such a useful tool they always seem to make an exception for David Brooks for behavior that would get anyone else fired and shunned. For example...
#WhenYoureAStarYouCanDoAnything https://twitter.com/HeerJeet/status/1368625246681456640?s=20 …pic.twitter.com/qZODmyBYV3
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
*sigh* Can’t count in anyone anymore.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"If you can't trust David Brooks to uphold a high moral standard who can...sorry I'm laughing. Give me a second and I'll come in again."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.