It’s pretty much how the trump admin proceeded throughout the whole time. Why would this be any different?!
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More for the Ethics Committee?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Impartial justice?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They still swore an oath to judge the case on the evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Back during Watergate, did people go around saying it is a "politcal procedure" or did Congress people take their responsibilities seriously back then?
-
Nixon was never impeached.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Justice Department just needs to charge Trump so we can move this into a real court of law.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Form of oath to be administered:I solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be,) that in all things appertaining to the trial of the impeachment of , now pending, I will do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws: so help me God.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is not “impartiality” - no matter whether you term it a “legal” proceeding or not. And for a side whose ENTIRE “strategy,” such as it is, consists in demanding protections of a legal proceeding be applied here, it is damning hypocrisy.
-
Your point is quite a poor one, is what I am saying.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.