Wow, unexamined stereotypical biases on aisle 1.
-
-
-
Right. If they had framed this policy without using stereotypes it would have been fine and not racist.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
"chump change" the last time anyone said that was approximately 1972 did they call the person trying to hired them a "jive sucker" as well
-
Or even a jive turkey? Sweet Christmas!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
From a project funded jointly by Princeton & Brookings. The report is a POS
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That seems to be the prevailing attitude
End of conversation
-
-
-
love the casual parallelism of "...but then find them unrewarding or abusive."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The institutional mainstreaming of this racist work has never stopped:https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/22/eugenics-racism-mainstream-science …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would like to see a study where they control for the race of the employer or perceived racism of the employer. I might demand more pay to compensate for whatever dignity I might have to exchange while performing the work.
-
And to clear: What I mean is that white people don't have to put up with things at work that non-white people sometimes do. Just as men don't have to put up with things at work that many women must put up with.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.