Yeah he did. It was $1200 checks and unemployment extensions. People plugged in know that he wasn’t responsible for that, but most people just know that they got a check in the mail that Trump had his name on
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
Agree... how policies hit people in their pocketbook tend to be more digestible
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Relying on the stock market and unemployment isn't making an economic argument. Trump's initial argument in 2016 was he'd restore factory and farming jobs to 1960s levels and he utterly failed, to the point where he needed to bribe those groups.
-
His admin gets credit among a lot of voters for $1200 dollar checks, extended unemployment, and a moratorium on evictions. People plugged into politics know he doesn’t deserve credit for that, but sadly most people give Presidents far too much credit for domestic policy
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Many Latinos from places like Venezuela, Brazil, and Colombia *explicitly* reject social framing of those economic arguments, maybe due to their experience with “the Left” in Latin America. They associate worker’s party with Dems now, fairly or not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it's not clear to me that Hillary made a more overt/compelling economic argument than Biden. Which leaves me feeling like this is, at best, an incomplete theory of the case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wut. Biden preached beating covid and government stability which is the economic argument. The leftist are cute.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.