So far, bloviating know everythings seem to have embraced the model.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#2 seems to be absolutely baked in to every media future at this point
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It depends on what you want to read. There's a lot of well-curated news feeds for the average cost of 2 substacks. Like others are expressing, I feel streaming overload. I subscribe to too much tv, several magazines, the Post, &
@Wonkette. Do I want a $60/year zine?
End of conversation
-
-
-
It could scarcely do more to increase polarization than traditional media
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They’ll get together and build Substack bundles of multiple writers and hire a Bundle Editor
-
Wow, they've invented Gawker Media? Or Huffington Post?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The idea of paying to read someone's self-edited blog is bizarre to me. Blogs were self-edited, but they were also free.
-
Nobody is at their best without an editor. Substantial pieces pretty much require multiple levels of editorial input and fact-checking.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
and stretching the potential viewership too thin. I mean, if I have to spend $5 a month to reach each of my favorite writers + newspaper subscriptions, that’s a lot of money for media consumption
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.