why don’t they just go back to weighting non-white/dem votes by 3/5?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I wonder if it's because ranting about sleaziness of a presidential candidate's kid, which a campaign & several media outlets are trying to launder into a story about the presidential candidate, would cloud the fact that story is laundered
End of conversation
-
-
-
I don't see the "provably false" bit anywhere. Best link?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great, so you can also mention the undeniable sleaziness of Donald Trump, his kids and his closest advisers? Because that seems more relevant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“provably false” is way too strong, especially when you’re talking about someone’s internal motivations or intentions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.