pretty clever of you guys to launder your own set of principles this way.
-
-
-
dont lump me in as you guys
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
yeah I think its kind of like the dialectic of the beautiful soul in the phenom of spirit, here described by Pinkardpic.twitter.com/xciSPICTl3
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What if events have inherent moral weight (“a man who wails is not a dancing bear,” per Cesaire) without being chained to some broader principle?
-
In more basic terms, we can take things seriously without being horribly about it. Nihilism and moralizing are not the only options!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Marxism fortunately is a framework that allows both positions, as tragedy repeats as farce
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This sounds like a difference around existentialism vs inherent meaning An existentialist has no problem laughing at the absurd, because at bottom there is not meaning An essentialist/idealist/etc. needs to find meaning at the bottom of it all, and negotiates instead of laughs
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some people watch coen brothers movies, some don’t
-
it's a good litmus test, yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.