Remember when a lot of people got their underwear tied up in knots over a magazine article raising the possibility that there could be another founding than 1776. https://twitter.com/AlisonSomin/status/1316424344189448192 …
-
-
I don’t understand why she can’t comment on Griswald. Her description of it as very “very very very” unlikely to be challenged before the court is her definition of ‘super precedent’ from yesterday, which she did talk about.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It’s laughable to imagine that a person living today can create a 250 some odd year old avatar in their mind and see how that avatar would understand 230 year old words applied to a modern situation. Fake conservatives made up this idea so they could overrule precedent.
End of conversation
-
-
-
One of the peculiarities of "originalism" is how they factor-in, or don't, that little incident between 1861-65 called "The Civil War" and the theory of union promulgated by the guy who won that war, in that very same Gettysburg Address you mention. It's not "law" either, but...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What would he know, he was a president not a lawyer guy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps someone should ask for her take on gravity? Thing or not a thing?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.