Just think of how pissed off AG Sulzberger must be about those covert changes to the 1619 Project to have (presumably) signed off on Bret Stephens' double-plus-length column eviscerating it, knowing full well how much it would antagonize the leftward portion of the staff.
Honestly, I think focusing on digital display copy, done by editors and not writers, shows the intellectual poverty of the attacks on 1619.
-
-
So make that your argument. Show proof there weren't changes to the text. That'd be compelling. Just don't minimize errors that may merit criticism. I vividly remember & am still embarrassed by every correction I've ever had-including a few in NYT. Most journos I know feel same.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.