My colleague John Nichols is right on the money here. This is a time to fight.https://twitter.com/NicholsUprising/status/1307176176432152577 …
-
-
5. If it's Barrett then there's no plausible deniability. A vote for her would be a vote to end Roe. The election would be about Roe. It's a real gamble. But if he doesn't pick Barrett, there's risk of alienating some powerful allies. The situation is fluid.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would you like a 4-4 split scotus to adjudicate a contested election
-
5-3. There will be no split.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
ABC will get a "nay" vote from Collins & Murkowski. Kethledge would get a "present" at least. Possibly a "Yea" if Collins loses and her last act is a chance to lockout hard-line Roe opponents for a generation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
#IHopeSomeoneHereHasBeatenMeToItInAskingThisBut: How About Marianne Trump Barry? In part b/c of that All County Building Supply & Maintenance thing. As I understand it, that has and hasn't been settled. Might be useful for the Religious Right, in the years to come...Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.