When 1619 was first published I wrote "it is easy to imagine a critique of the 1619 Project from a variety of radical positions such as internationalism, black nationalism, and Marxism." I still think these theoretical perspectives illuminate more than Wilentzian persnicketiness
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get you, but sometimes when you know a fight is coming, you get into fight mode right away.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Class reductionist Marxism is in fact bad, yes.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I know you rarely do on twitter, but you really should think about showing your work on this to explain how you got to the place where it's the fault of "liberals" that conservatives lost their minds about the 1619 project.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Um, I think it's all the white supremacy that's the problem, not some argumentative libs on social media.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Sean Wilentz, man of the people. LOL
End of conversation
-
-
-
The author of the 1619 project accused the work's critics of being racially biased. Accusing *them* of escalating this is hilarious.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.