No, it's saying that given that slavery existed, there would not have been a USA if the Constitution hadn't accommodated it.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
nominative determinism?
End of conversation
-
-
-
I'd about be money that's not what he meant until he saw how pissed off everyone was.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But still an indictment of Cotton's rejection of the fundamental premise of the 1619 project.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Necessary evil for the Constitution” still means we should teach the 1619 Project and related history about slavery.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
narrower, less interesting...but still shit shit shit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This reminds me of the John Adams quote, "Mark me, Franklin. If we give in on this issue, there will be trouble one hundred years hence. Posterity will never forgive us." People knew slavery was wrong even back then. People knew slavery was not sustainable even back then.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.