I've always been irritated by the conservative trope that "X is a substitute for religion" -- with X standing for some modern thing that conservatives don't like. It's a truism that doesn't illuminate because in the past religion saturated cultural & intellectual life.
To the extent that various belief systems have rituals, iconography etc. that's because rituals, iconography etc are a time-tested & useful ways to structure social life -- they are the socially functional part of all religion & much non-religion.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don't think they are distinctively religious except that historically they were once the monopoly of religion and are now much more widely used by religion & non-religion alike. Maybe what is distinctly modern is seeing religion as a sphere apart from social life.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.