There should be fewer takes and takemakers and more “reporters”
-
Show this thread
-
I’d be interested in hearing the journalistic argument for papers maintaining such large op-ed staffs/budgets at a time when so many local reporters have disappeared /there are tons of outlets publishing takes, as opposed to reinvesting those resources into reported journalism
27 replies 258 retweets 1,436 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @WesleyLowery
I agree in principle but doesn't the Times make money from the op-ed section?
2 replies 3 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Do they? I genuinely don’t know the answer/economics of it
4 replies 3 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @WesleyLowery @HeerJeet
it's an enormous source of traffic
5 replies 3 retweets 58 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JHWeissmann @chrislhayes and
My view is that while every major paper's short term interest is in exciting and thrilling a core audience of partisans - the overall effect will degrade the inherited social capital that makes the biggest newspapers valuable
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
Also true of political parties!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.