There should be fewer takes and takemakers and more “reporters”
-
Show this thread
-
I’d be interested in hearing the journalistic argument for papers maintaining such large op-ed staffs/budgets at a time when so many local reporters have disappeared /there are tons of outlets publishing takes, as opposed to reinvesting those resources into reported journalism
27 replies 258 retweets 1,436 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @WesleyLowery
I agree in principle but doesn't the Times make money from the op-ed section?
2 replies 3 retweets 27 likes -
Replying to @HeerJeet
Do they? I genuinely don’t know the answer/economics of it
4 replies 3 retweets 26 likes
Replying to @WesleyLowery
My understanding is that the columns get syndicated & the Times gets a big cut.
12:05 PM - 14 Jul 2020
0 replies
2 retweets
12 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.