Signing the letter doesn't mean affirming Rick MacArthur's stewardship of Harper's, which I'm on record as saying has been a disaster. The MacArthur family should let go of Harper's & it should be taken over by a better, non-union busting, non-profit.https://twitter.com/juliacarriew/status/1280561619496431616 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
They absolutely are because that is 100% their goal.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Maybe reading it would help. It is a relatively short text. https://harpers.org/a-letter-on-justice-and-open-debate/ …
End of conversation
-
-
-
Do you think that those figures believed that criticizing them harshly was consistent with the principles of the letter? If they didn't believe that, how do you reconcile the difference between your interpretation and their interpretation?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jeet is bad again.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
they sort of are. you’re confused.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what exactly are the principles of a “defend free speech” letter that was signed by someone who tried to get professors fired because they supported the cause of palestine.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think it’s great that the people signing the letter have had to spend all day defending or denying their associations with other people who signed the letter, showing that the letter itself has no substance or merits
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.