9. But Bennet has had a harder time expanding with right-wing voices, in part because it is harder to find Trumpists who can write non-batshit stuff (one exception is @ToryAnarchist, who the Times has been running). So paper settled back to Never Trumpists, mainly.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @HeerJeet @ToryAnarchist
Yeah, they should have just hired DM straight out. Inform/expose/vehemently rebut.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SWGoldman @yeselson and
Lind would be great. There is another desire at work here: to reach out to conservative readers, by having conservative writers. This conflicts with the reality of what the conservative movement is, which is about white grievances. There's a direct, irresolvable conflict.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @HeerJeet @SWGoldman and
Basically, you can do high minded racial/ethnic anxieties—so intellectuals like Caldwell and McCarthy speak for the base. If you *want* writers to speak for the base. Actually, I do. I want to read their vile stuff in one place. I guess I want to read Carl Schmitt in 1932 as well
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @SWGoldman @HeerJeet and
I’m saying they are authoritarian racial nationalist intellectuals, not that they are Nazi sympathizers. I’m putting them on a relative scale in our time and place vs that time and place. And I’m saying run their stuff and push back hard.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yeselson @SWGoldman and
Interesting, Rich. Do you read, like, National Greatness or Claremont Review of Books? I read Victor Davis Hanson, but except for him, I really only read people that I learn from or respect.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I rag on it but American Affairs is doing an interesting job of trying to create a high-brow Trumpism.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.