Actually this manages to lift my spirits a bit. It's...something.
-
-
-
Really? I find it depressing that after lengthy defenses by the editorial page editor and the publisher, they're admitting they rushed into print something that didn't meet their "standards"
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
All the news that comes at you fast.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@nytimes now do IraqThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is annoying. Now that the damage is done, they propose to have less Op-Ed’s. No. Run the same amount. But, don’t run fascist BS.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Still bullshit. The problem with the piece isn't fundamentally that it was sloppy; a finely polished call to exterminate the protesters wouldn't have been meaningfully an improvement. Nothing there addresses the decision to run with this idea at all. Nor the banning of comments.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At a certain point "a rushed editorial process" just becomes your paper's standard editorial process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So I guess cancelling my subscription today was a bad idea, huh?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh no what a crazy coup* *reading and fact checking op-eds
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.