1. Vice-presidential picks, unless they are truly disastrous (Eagleton, Palin), don't count much in elections. But they are important for unifying parties and allowing them to function as coalitions.
-
-
Their combined age is 150. Val Demmings will be his pick. After his roving foot made it to his mouth last week, this is even more certain.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. An objective case can be made that Kamala Harris is more progressive than Warren. Bernie’s followers dislike both of them for the same reason https://progressivepunch.org/scores.htm?house=senate …
-
I actually think Kamala would be a far smarter pick than warren because there is less ill will at her
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Fascinating thing about Warren is that she clearly illustrates how a politician can be extremely unpopular with the population at large but the pundits will pretend they're not if the politician appeals to them personally
-
Like about 100 other similar pieces this one ignores Warren's spectacular failure in the primaries (including in her own state!) and instead focuses on a single poll of 600 people conducted by data for progress (lol)
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah, that's why all the polling says she is by far the favorite choice of Bernie voters, for VP. Why she won the vote of Our Revolution members (an organization Bernie literally started) for who they want as VP, in a landslide.
- Show replies
-
-
-
I’ll vote for whomever the VP pick us, but if 10 women, Warren would be my last choice
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.