A real and serious question for @AIPAC :
In light of this statement, what Israeli steps might actually warrant a change US-Israel relationship?
Pretty sure the answer is a resounding “NOTHING” to bd expressed in no response to this. Prove me wrong! https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-aipac-annexation-should-not-change-u-s-israel-relationship-1.8844267 …
After more than 5 decades of a people living under armed occupation, it's hard to take so benign a view of the pretexts that what is being done is temporary.
-
-
I guess if you want to be logically off point and smear making any distinction as having a "benign view" ...
-
No pretext means no one is pretending —that it’s temporary. This is a non-disagreement.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In any event one type of annexation would prevent any remaining degree of armed occupation, and we know you're against it so obviously you have multiple interests/values at play
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.